Harriet Harman

Hurting So Many People

When people willfully hurt others seriously in pursuit of their aims - no matter how noble they might proclaim these aims to be - they have no moral leg to stand upon should people decide to do the same to them in pursuit of their own 'noble' aims.  

As such, and for example, while it might be the case that Bush and Blair (and Harriet Harman) bombed Iraq in order to pursue noble aims, matters might look very different indeed to, let's say, those Iraqis whose completely innocent loved ones have been killed or disabled.

Similarly, and for example again, while it might be the case that feminists (like Harriet Harman) say that they believe sincerely that, for example, her policies that intentionally and seriously harm thousands of innocent men every year are morally acceptable, these men might well disagree.

And, remember, such men need only to possess the same moral attitude as she in order to feel quite justified in 'paying her back' by causing her serious harm.

This is the kind of moral degeneration that Harriet Harman and her cronies are bringing to us.

For example, when men see judges doing something like this, ...

..............................

A teacher who says he was falsely accused of sexually abusing pupils yesterday lost a legal battle to clear his name.

John Pinnington, 59, was told that all potential future employers must be told about the accusations, even though they were never proved.

Nonetheless, the fact that the allegations were made meant that he lost his job.

Since then Mr Pinnington has failed to find a job because the abuse allegations appear on his file at the Criminal Records Bureau, which issues certificates for everyone seeking to work with children.

Although Lord Justice Richards agreed that the accusations against Mr Pinnington, of Wallingford, Oxfordshire, had 'serious weaknesses' and 'could not be substantiated', he said that did not entirely negate them.

..............................

... it seems to me that they are quite justified in believing that the judge and, of course, the politicians who persist in maintaining policies that bring about such injustices towards men in their courtrooms, deserve to have their own lives seriously damaged; firstly, because of the damage that they have inflicted upon so many others and, secondly, because it will help to dissuade them from doing such things again.

But is this what people like Harriet Harman actually want to bring about? - perhaps to justify even more draconian measures against innocent men.

I suspect that this is exactly what she is doing; because, please remember that the Governing Elite loves to stir up trouble. Trouble is what empowers this elite.

Furthermore, of course, the appalling way in which John Pinnington is being treated is yet another example of our politicians and judges undermining our justice system - which is supposed to be based on justice.

Yes, believe it or not, the judges are supposed to be providing justice - not damaging horrendously the lives of people when they have done nothing to deserve this.

And so when a judge happily implements a law that he knows is going to hurt seriously thousands of people who do not deserve to be hurt, then he is corrupt, he is a phony and, morally speaking, he has precious little defence should those people decide to do the same sort of thing to him.

After all, he is not a God!

Worse; he masquerades as an upholder of justice, but he is a fraud; worse than a fraud - because he is the perpetrator of injustice - gross injustice. 

And, I repeat, he also undermines our whole system of what is supposed to be JUSTICE - something which any decent society must have in order to remain decent; and something that we cannot allow morally-bankrupt officials - such as judges - to throw away.

Furthermore, this judge is actually promoting the notion throughout the public's consciousness that it is quite acceptable to damage very seriously another person's life; someone who cannot be shown to have done anything wrong, and someone who cannot be shown to deserve such appalling treatment.

Think very carefully about this.

This judge is actually saying that it is 'justice' to ruin the life of a man who cannot be shown to  have done anything wrong.

Well, this is certainly not the kind of world in which most of us want to live, and it is not the kind of world that we want for those whom we care about.

And so we should all be doing something about this completely unacceptable state of affairs.

...

And now, I have a question for all you men out there.

For how long, exactly, are you going to put up with this sort of thing before you actually do something about it? - before you decide that enough is enough.

Or do you really think that the judge in the case above is actually dispensing justice in his courtroom?

Of course not. He is doing no such thing.

He is willfully inflicting a serious injustice on a male teacher.

This man's entire career, his pension, his standing etc etc - in other words, his life - are completely worthless in the eyes of this judge. They count for nothing. 

What is important to this judge is to permit other government officials to continue scuppering this man's future - or, indeed, any other man who is in similar circumstances. (And there are already thousands of men in similar circumstances.)

Lord Justice Richards is just a government thug - in my view.

This man is not fit to be a judge - in my view.

He is actually saying that government officials are entitled to continue to mess up the lives of thousands of men simply because members of certain 'privileged' groups have made accusations about them.

But there are many others like him.

And what they are doing in cases such as this is pursuing the feminist-leftwing aim to make it virtually impossible for men to be anywhere near children.

One accusation, no matter how untrue, and the man's future is seriously damaged - on many fronts; not just when it comes to employment. And so, of course, men will even more likely than is already the case have to keep themselves away from children - or teenagers - or risk the most horrible of consequences.

And, of course, this kind of treatment will help to drive even more men away from all those professions (e.g. teachers, youth workers, police officers etc etc) that have anything to do with children. And we all know of the numerous negative effects on our society that have already come about as a result of men and children being driven apart.

But, as those of you who have read your History books will know, this is exactly what the government wants. The more disharmony and the more unhappiness, the better; e.g. see The Governing Elite.

And if you do not actively do your best to expose what is going on then, not only are you a fool and, clearly, a wimp, but matters for you will simply get much, much worse throughout the rest of your life.

These people are causing misery on a huge scale - particularly for men.

And they must be stopped.

... 

Martin Luther King ...

Injustice, anywhere, is a threat to justice everywhere.

We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. 

...

Tony Benn - a UK Labour MP for 51 years ...

"Democracy is not just voting every five years and watching Big Brother in between and wondering why nothing happens. Democracy is what we do and say where we live and work." 

...

More about John Pinnington ...

John Pinnington, a man of exemplary good character, has never been charged let alone prosecuted for any act of sexual abuse, or indeed abuse of any kind.

But because of the way the law has been framed, a FALSE allegation is all it now takes to ensure that a man [any man] can never work with children or vulnerable adults again.

Yes indeed, Dear Reader, how long are you prepared to be treated as if you were completely and utterly worthless, eh?

And don't ever kid yourself that John Pinnington is some kind of exception. 

There are thousands of men every year in the UK alone who are falsely accused of some kind of 'abuse'. (Have a look at these two - from a few years back ... It Happened To Me.)

And over the years I have seen countless tales of such men committing suicide, losing their careers, and/or their families and their friends in the process. After all, just about all those who accuse men of sexual abuse must be believed, right? - regardless of what the evidence might show.

They are guilty!

And for every one of those men who has committed suicide, there will be a thousand whose lives were made so miserable that they got very close to doing such a thing.

(Indeed, the view that nearly all accused men are guilty even when they are actually found 'not guilty' in a courtroom is heavily promoted by the likes of Harriet Harman and her lying cronies working at the Home Office.)

And if you think that this sort of thing is not going to affect you - perhaps because you do not ever come across youngsters in your life - then think again; because it will soon be any allegation of 'abuse' (rape, sexual assault, domestic violence, sexual harassment etc etc) by a woman or a youngster that will be used to trail you for life.

Let me repeat; any allegation.

And this is why when I think about politicians such as Harriet Harman, who - in order to pursue their own ambitions - are prepared through their policies to inflict such misery on to thousands of people - people who have done absolutely nothing wrong, I realise that I am thinking about scum - real scum.

That is my honest view.

...

All adults who work or volunteer with children must have abuse allegations made against them investigated by council officers and kept on file until they retire, even if they are totally groundless. - i.e. the left-wing/feminist aim to break apart all relationships between men and children continues.

The next step will be to keep on file all groundless allegations made by women over issues such as domestic violence, sex-assault etc etc

...

What hope is there for any of us if high-ranking government officials such as judges and politicians are continually permitted to hurt quite unjustifiably so many of their own people? - and yet there is barely a peep of protest to be heard.