On alpha males and females ...

Get Real posts on The Spearhead ...

As societies become more civilized, they tend to marginalize the true alpha male, outlawing polygamy, rape, and domestic violence, and demanding paternal investment (child support) in biological children. So the worst traits of alpha males have been criminalized, and rightly so. Such men are senselessly violent, parasitic, and extremely disruptive.

However, the alpha-female variety of behavior is too subtle to control by law. Where a man would physically lash out at someone, the woman is inclined to inflict grievous social harm, and it’s easy to do this without breaking any laws. The alpha female, nearly as much of a monster as the alpha male, is allowed to roam free.

Who owns who? ...

Fedrz posts on Spearhead ...

Who does a child belong to? The State? Themselves? Or do they belong to their parents?

How can a woman sue a man for his future labours in divorce & child support, something intangible, if she doesn’t have a property right claim to it?

By the way, suing someone for labour – is forced labour – forced labour is Slavery. Were the slaves “owned?”

Men are still considered the Chattels of their families – otherwise, upon divorce, they would be free from all obligations to them, the same way that a woman is free from all obligations to her ex-husband upon divorce.

She doesn’t spread her legs for him 2.6 times a wk and give him a birthday blowjob anymore, does she? Who cleans his house and makes him sandwiches now?

She is freed from all obligations to him, but she still sues him for her rights to his labour – his labour is considered her property. i.e. Slavery.

on life without a woman ...

Zimmy posts on Spearhead ...

"I’ve found that without a woman around my life is much, much easier."

ABSOLUTELY! After living with three different women for a total of 22 years, I was astounded at how free (and mellow) it felt to be unburdened by the ‘mood swings’; female carping, and beast of burden duties that I and virtually every other man deals with when living with women.

……feels like vacation……

on the tactic of labelling all men who criticise feminism as 'misogynists' ...

Zed posts on Spearhead ...

What makes that whole mind game so evil is that it only works when it isn’t true.

For years, men who truly did still like women twisted themselves into knots trying to prove to his “accuser” that it [being a misogynist]wasn’t true. That is one of those differences between men and women that men seem to have to learn the hard way.

If a man accuses you of something, it is because he believes it to be true. But, women often use accusations in an instrumental manner because trying to disprove the accusation will manipulate the man into exactly the kind of behavior she wants from him.

On women forever desiring bad men ...

Sexy Thugs posts on Spearhead ...

Actually, I would argue that convicts are highly desired for pleasure by women and breeding by the underclass. Women are the cheerleaders for thug culture. Sociopathic and abusive men are incredibly sexy to the average f*cked-up woman.

For the matriarchy, this serves useful political purposes for the production of babies by single mothers (adding to welfare state) and the ability to blame “all men” for the actions of a few.

The wet hole between a woman’s legs is the most powerful motivator on this planet, and by looking at society, we can see what women are using it for.

on why so many women now hate men ...

John Dias posts on Spearhead ...

... you have to recall a little-recognized tidbit about women: when women feel rotten about themselves, they project their self-loathing in the form of an accusation.

That quote is a prime example of the insecurity that such women feel about not feeling as essential and vital as men. Reverse the genders and you'll see that it is really a woman worrying about her own obsolescence to the opposite sex, and soon it will all make sense.

Think about it... Men have invented nearly EVERYTHING. How could an entitled, pampered woman in an advanced industrial society get along without the labor, intellectual capital, and protection of men?

Surely even to the most self-important princess, it must occur now-and-then that the primary contribution to society of the collective of women is the love and nurturing that they provide to their husbands and children.

Since fewer women in these societies are realizing their natural purpose, their only frame of reference for any kind of social value or status is that which is deservedly enjoyed by the collective of men. In the backs of their minds, such women must occasionally realize that they can never measure up as an entire gender to what men have accomplished by doing what is natural to men.

Women like the one who made the above statement are bitter that they missed out on a loving husband and the joys of having a baby, and they're bitter that on a collective basis women don't care much to match the achievements of men in industry, business, science, architecture, philosophy, religion, and so many other endeavors of civilization.

So they sit and stew in their bitterness, loathing what they have become.

To relieve their pain, they cast their hatred of themselves onto that which they wish to become -- those whom they inwardly miss deeply, the very men who have rejected them.

Such statements [hostile to men] are cries of pain by women who couldn't put aside their own hatred and self-absorption long enough to realize that femininity, motherhood and marriage to a strong man who could lead them are what really would have made them happy all along.

on women's legitimate fear of becoming redundant ...

Alex posts on Spearhead ...

I agree with JohnDias... ITs just self-loathing turned outwards.

Women in general tend to be (this isn't scientific, just an observation), but they seem as if they're hardwired to do emotional projections of everything.

It is pretty apparent that if anything, Feminism is actually institutionalized penis-envy.

Its women feeling injusticed by nature for not having male traits, and then reverse-rationalizing it. A lot (most?) women have some of these feelings, but feminism is a movement that exaggerates and projects those deep-seated fears on a large-scale.

I have had the exact same though as JohnDias, as if anything, its pretty clear that if anything, women are the gender to go extinct. (this is the part they call "misogynist)... But, women really do tend not to bring much to the table (on an evolutionary side) aside from sex/child-birth.

If technology arrives that substitutes sex, and you can have babies/parenting out of a tube, women as a gender go pretty much extinct.

There is no biological reason to prolong the female gender. At everything else they're either equal, or less capable. With the arrival of pornography, women's insecurities grew larger... and new technologies on the horizon are making women more insecure than ever.

When feminists ask questions like "are men really necessary", its really just them secretly asking "are women necessary"... And the answer is honestly... Even though I love some women very dearly - the answer is no.

If someone invents a substitute for sex and procreation, society can still progress, and the sky is the limit. Women are quite expensive in evolutionary terms, and they really don't make as much sense without the sex/reproduction ability. Its just women throwing a tantrum at the internal fear of going extinct.