responding to feminists ...

unknown author

Same old anti-male, anti-fact, illogical feminist shite.

Where to begin?

If a man points out feminism's essential hypocrisy, he's dismissed as "angry." Meanwhile Traister-like screeds are always deemed "energetic" and "scrappy." The message? Men have no legitimate grievances, especially not against feminism.

Rebecca asks: "Do you think it's fair that a guy will make more money doing the same job as you?"

Actually, women make less because they DON'T do the same jobs. Nor do they work over-time, for as many hours, or as many uninterrupted years. Women don't scramble to become cross-country truckers, test pilots, demolition experts, road builders or high-iron workers.

More ms-communication: "Does it piss you off and scare you when you find out about your friends getting raped?"

She doesn't, of course, ask women if they are angry or upset when males get mugged. Rape is one of the rarest, most lied about crimes. It's also the only one where the accuser is protected while the accused is attacked. Men are also its biggest victims, many males being raped in prison. That's deemed okay because, well, incarcerated women aren't raped as regularly, even by members of the opposite sex.

Another gem: "Do you ever feel like shit about your body?"

Men worry about expanding guts, balding heads, aging faces, etc. But because men are socialized (often by women!) to not talk about such things, feminists assume silence means no male problems. So much for females being more empathic.

Repackaging more tripe, Traister asks: "Do you ever feel like something is wrong with you because you don't fit into this bizarre ideal of what girls are supposed to be like?"

As if boys (drugged in class and committing more suicides) don't have equal issues!

This repackaged Faludi-in-Wolf's clothing continues: "On the top of my list is violence against women, and how almost expected it is that we're still having conversations about whether it's OK to rape someone because they're drunk."

MEN are the biggest victims of violence. Of course, selfish and sexist feminists focus only on women, lying in the process. Rebecca assumes men routinely rape drunk women. She never notes that women CHOOSE to get drunk and/or that subsequent sex is a muddled mess (the male often being drunk, too). How about telling women to stop getting hammered? How about saying drunken men are legally exempt from punishment, too?

As for equal reproductive rights, feminists fight that. They want choice for women, obligation for men.

Per feminism and "backlash"...the latter is merely the understandable reaction to being perpetually slapped by feminists who like to dish it out, but can't take it.

She asks, "how can I make a blanket judgment about all young women who do something? I also don't know that this boob-flashing thing is as pervasive as everyone thinks it is." Right. Showing tits is "savvy," while men looking at them is sexist. And while boob-flashing is deemed not pervasive, rape is everywhere.

Traister protests the "general idea...that women are children" yet wants the government or other Big Daddy to protect them and punish men. She wants women to act like bosses' daughters at company picnics, always getting home-runs while barely being able to hold the bat.

She learned about "rape schedules" in Women's Studies. Such programs teach the fear of men. Instead of compulsively wiping doors with germ-killers, modern girly-girls dread encounters with half the world. It's like they were taught in science fiction classes that Martians will invade at any moment.

Nothing new here. It's the same old anti-life, anti-intellectual, anti-male claptrap recycled from bitter, aged, lonely crones who couldn't get dates 40 years ago.